Validate more than how an attacker could move.
XM Cyber emphasizes validated attack paths, critical assets, and choke-point remediation. Hayrok goes further — asking whether the entry point was exploitable, the condition present at runtime, the relationship observed vs. inferred, and whether remediation actually eliminated the path.
A graph should tell you what you know.
Hayrok's attack-path model distinguishes inferred, observed, validated, blocked, and remediated relationships — with clear evidence for each.
- — Which choke point should we fix?
- — Which paths appear to reach the crown jewel?
- — How does the model rank the paths?
- — Which assets are on the graph?
- → Was the entry point truly exploitable?
- → Was the condition present at runtime?
- → Was the relationship observed — or only inferred?
- → Did a control interrupt the path?
- → Did attacker behavior generate a detection?
- → Did remediation actually eliminate the path?
Move from security exposure to security proof.
Hayrok combines governed adversarial validation, evidence, defensive response, validated attack paths, and continuous revalidation in one operating model.
Inferred → Observed → Validated → Blocked → Remediated.
Every attack-path relationship carries a state and its evidence.
From modeled paths to validated paths.
Don't just map the path. Prove it.
From point tools to a governed program.
See what changes when the objective, the authorization, the evidence, and the defensive response are the centre of the workflow.