Validate paths attackers
can actually use.
See how validated exposures, identities, runtime conditions, controls, and detections connect to critical business assets. Hayrok distinguishes possible relationships from attack paths supported by validation evidence.
From Entry to Crown Jewel
Path
types.
Exposure-to-crown-jewel
What it connects
Public apps, internet-facing APIs, exposed infra, cloud services, edge systems → sensitive databases, revenue systems, identity infrastructure, backups, critical services—with evidence for every step.
Identity
What it connects
Users, privileged and service accounts, tokens, roles, trust relationships, cloud and workload identities → sensitive assets and administrative control.
Cloud
What it connects
Public resource → exposed workload → IAM role assumption → excessive permission → network access → storage access → critical cloud service.
API
What it connects
Public endpoint → authentication weakness → authorization failure → business-logic abuse → backend service → data store → sensitive business function.
Runtime
What it connects
Observed evidence confirms the affected component is deployed, the service is active, the code path exists, the workload can communicate, the dependency is loaded, and the target is available.
Critical Together
Toxic
combinations.
Conditions that become critical together.
Per-Path Detail
Validated path
details.
Every path shows the full picture—so prioritisation, ownership, and remediation are grounded in what has actually been proven.
Every path shows
Break the Most Paths
Remediation
choke points.
Hayrok highlights the actions that disrupt the most paths at once.
Proven vs. Inferred
Why evidence-backed
paths matter.
Configuration-inferred graphs generate many theoretical routes. By marking each edge as confirmed or inferred and tying it to validation evidence, Hayrok collapses the noise into the paths that are actually walkable—and points to the single fixes that break the most of them.
Walkable, Not Theoretical
“Collapse the noise into the paths that are actually walkable—and find the fixes that break the most of them.”
Every edge labeled confirmed or inferred, tied to validation evidence.
FAQ
Frequently asked
questions.
What is a validated attack path?
A route to a critical asset where steps are supported by validation evidence, not just inferred from configuration.
How is confirmed different from inferred?
Confirmed edges are backed by observed evidence; inferred edges are possible but unproven, and paths label both.
What path types are covered?
Exposure-to-crown-jewel, identity, cloud, API, and runtime paths.
What is a toxic combination?
Individually minor conditions that become critical together, such as public API plus authorisation failure.
How does runtime evidence help?
It confirms the components and communication a path needs are actually present and active.
What does a path show?
Confidence, entry point, target, business impact, steps, confirmed/inferred edges, supporting findings, identities, control responses, detection coverage, and choke points.
What are remediation choke points?
Actions that disrupt the largest number of attack paths at once.
How does this help prioritisation?
It focuses effort on walkable paths to crown jewels and the fixes with the broadest effect.
Where does the evidence come from?
From validation runs, correlated through Evidence Fabric and Attack Graph Intelligence.
Keep Exploring
Where paths
lead.
See risk as an
attacker would.
Move beyond lists of findings and identify the paths capable of reaching your most important assets.