INTERNET EXPOSURE VALIDATION
Prove which internet-facing assets are actually exposed, exploitable, and reachable .
Hayrok validates public applications, APIs, infrastructure, services, and cloud assets to determine which exposures attackers can realistically exploit and whether they provide paths into sensitive environments.
EVIDENCE-BACKED FINDINGSGOVERNED EXECUTIONSAFE VALIDATION SCENARIOSCONTINUOUS REVALIDATION
7.2×
Faster exposure closure
vs. periodic assessments
31%
Discovered assets not in CMDB
typical first-run finding
< 24h
From discovery to validated proof
per exposed service
THE CHALLENGE
Your internet-facing attack surface changes faster than periodic assessments can track.
New services, APIs, cloud resources, DNS records, and application endpoints are exposed continuously. Attack surface tools can identify what appears to be public, but they do not always prove whether the asset is active, vulnerable, protected, or connected to sensitive internal systems.
Security teams still need to know:
- ?Is the exposed asset active?
- ?Can an attacker interact with it?
- ?Is the weakness exploitable?
- ?Did the WAF or edge control respond?
- ?Can the exposure lead to an internal asset?
- ?Does it create a path to a crown jewel?
Hayrok validates those conditions directly.
SCANNERS vs. VALIDATION
Scanner
- Config & CVE lists
- Theoretical severity
- No runtime attribution
- No control response
Hayrok VALIDATION
- Exploitability proof
- Reachability path
- Control & detection response
- Business impact
EVIDENCE CONTRACT
Request/responsecaptured
Control responsecorrelated
Detection eventmeasured
Reachabilitygraphed
Business impactmapped
VALIDATION COVERAGE
Validate the conditions that create real internet exposure risk.
Eight validation capabilities. Every one produces evidence, control response, and reachable impact.
01
Public asset exposure
Confirm whether discovered applications, hosts, domains, APIs, and cloud services are accessible from the internet.
DNSCDNCloud
02
External service exposure
Validate exposed ports, protocols, management interfaces, and internet-facing services.
SSHRDPAdmin
03
Exposed APIs
Identify public API endpoints and assess authentication, authorization, and data access behavior.
RESTGraphQLgRPC
04
Runtime presence
Confirm whether the exposed component or service is active in the relevant environment.
RuntimeEDR
05
Reachability to internal
Determine whether the external entry point can provide access to internal systems or sensitive services.
Segmentation
06
Edge control behavior
Validate WAF, CDN, gateway, rate-limiting, and perimeter security responses.
WAFCDN
07
Internet attack paths
Map how a public exposure could connect to identities, internal systems, data stores, and crown jewels.
Attack Graph
08
Third-party exposure
Assess subsidiary, vendor, and shadow domains reachable from the public internet.
VendorsASM
PRODUCT · INTERNET EXPOSURE
Every public asset. Validated in evidence.
EVIDENCE AND PROOF
Every result is supported by validation evidence.
Not a screenshot. A machine-verifiable evidence pack per finding.
E-01
Public asset exposure evidence
Enumerated services with reachability proof and asset ownership.
E-02
DNS and service evidence
Resolved records, TLS metadata, and service fingerprints.
E-03
Request and response artifacts
Full HTTP transcripts showing exploit conditions and control response.
E-04
Runtime presence confirmation
Live workload attribution — not just an IP responding.
E-05
WAF and CDN control responses
What blocked, logged, or passed — with rule IDs.
E-06
External attack path evidence
Multi-hop paths from public asset to internal or crown-jewel target.
SCENARIO EXAMPLES
Run scenarios aligned with realistic attacker behavior.
Recommended by objective, asset scope, telemetry, and safety requirements.
HOW IT WORKS
From objective to verified remediation.
Five steps. Every one governed, observable, and evidenced.
01
Select the objective
Choose the outcome and define assets, environments, and business services in scope.
02
Review scenarios
Hayrok maps the objective to relevant scenario packs, telemetry, and safety controls.
03
Run governed validation
Genesis coordinates recon, planning, approvals, execution, and evidence collection.
04
Review findings
See confirmed risk, control responses, detection responses, and remediation guidance.
05
Revalidate remediation
Rerun the relevant scenarios and confirm whether the issue is resolved.
BUSINESS VALUE
Turn validation into measurable security improvement.
01
Risk reduction
Reduce internet-driven breach risk by closing the exposures that matter — with proof they were real.
02
Defensive effectiveness
Validate WAFs, CDNs, and edge controls under realistic behavior, not synthetic ping tests.
03
Remediation prioritization
Rank exposures by reachable business impact, not just CVSS.
04
Evidence and assurance
Give leadership, auditors, and regulators evidence that exposure was validated and closed.
POWERED BY THE PLATFORM
One platform. Every validation.
Internet Exposure Validation composes with the full Hayrok stack.
GENESIS
Genesis Validation Engine
Plans and executes governed validation workflows.
Explore →
SCENARIOS
Scenario Library
Curated scenarios aligned with the selected objective.
Explore →
AGENTS
Validation Agents
Coordinate recon, execution, validation, and reporting.
Explore →
EVIDENCE
Evidence Fabric
Collects and correlates the proof supporting each finding.
Explore →
ATTACK GRAPH
Attack Graph Intelligence
Connects validated conditions to attack paths and crown jewels.
Explore →
HAY AI
Hay AI
Explains evidence, supports investigations, and recommends fixes.
Explore →
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What is Internet Exposure Validation?+
Internet Exposure Validation is Hayrok's continuous, governed process for proving — with evidence — which internet exposure risks are actually exploitable, and which controls, detections, and paths respond as intended.
How is it different from scanning or assessment?+
Scanners describe what might be wrong. Assessments describe what should be true. Hayrok executes governed validation scenarios and produces evidence-backed findings — with control response, detection response, reachability, and business impact.
What does Hayrok validate?+
Assets, exposure, identities, controls, telemetry, detections, and end-to-end attack paths — from external entry point to critical business asset — under policy and safety gates.
What evidence does Hayrok produce?+
Request and response artifacts, control responses, detection events, telemetry attribution, reachability paths, and business-impact mapping — all recorded in Evidence Fabric and tied to the run.
Is validation safe for production environments?+
Yes. Every scenario runs under Genesis with policy gates: authorized scope, safe-mode defaults, maintenance windows, blast-radius constraints, human approvals for exploit steps, and interruption controls.
Does Hayrok replace existing security tools?+
No. Hayrok validates them. It correlates scanner findings, control policies, and detection intent against reality — reducing noise and surfacing actual exploitable risk.
How often should validation be performed?+
Continuously for high-priority objectives. On-demand after significant environment changes. On schedule for board and audit assurance. Genesis runs and revalidates on any cadence.
Can teams revalidate completed remediation?+
Yes. Rerun the original scenario and Hayrok classifies the outcome as resolved, partially resolved, regressed, or still exploitable — with the same evidence contract as the initial finding.
Ready to validate internet exposure risk?
See how Hayrok helps your team move from theoretical risk to evidence-backed validation.