The adversarial exposure validation platform for web applications, APIs, and identities. Go beyond breach and attack simulation with continuous security validation: prove exploitable exposure, inspect replayable evidence, and verify fixes within the scope you approve.
Design partners across financial services, healthcare, SaaS, manufacturing, and government.
Continuous security validation that proves which exposures an attacker can actually use, and proves it inside boundaries your team controls. Four words, four commitments.
Approved scope, identities, actions, and limits. Nothing runs without a named approver, and anyone with authority can stop a run.
Agents exercise the techniques an attacker would use against your applications, APIs, and identities, not a checklist of signatures.
The question is whether a weakness creates a usable path to data, money, or operations, under the identities that matter.
Each result is reproduced, observed, or not confirmed, with replayable evidence and a retest after the fix.
Continuous web application, API, and identity security validation. Start with the boundary your team needs to understand. Bring relevant access context, business rules, and evidence into a governed validation.
Hayrok is a governed continuous security validation platform. Ask about a finding, investigate its evidence, and move into an authorized validation workflow with the context your team needs.
Assess supported prompt-injection, data-exposure, retrieval, and action boundaries. Inspect evidence of what the system returned, accessed, or executed.
Scanners and reports leave these open. Continuous security validation closes each one with a replayable evidence record.
Run approved scenarios against the finding and record whether each condition was reproduced, observed, or not confirmed. Prioritize exploitable security findings, not theoretical ones.
See a validation → ACCESS BOUNDARIESCompare the same request under each configured user, role, and tenant. Authorization and tenant isolation gaps become evidence, not guesses.
Web application exposure validation → CONTROLS AND DETECTIONSEvery executed step records what your controls observed, so teams can validate security controls and detections against real attack techniques.
Security control validation in Hive → REMEDIATIONRetest from the original evidence record after a fix. The result joins the same record, so engineering and audit see one history.
How Evidence Fabric verifies fixes →Running real attack techniques in production is only safe when you approve the plan. Set the conditions for validation before it runs. Keep approved scope, performed actions, and resulting evidence connected.
Nectar reasons across the relationships between assets, identities, trust boundaries, weaknesses, attack paths, controls, and evidence. It coordinates the investigation, plans compatible validation, orchestrates specialized agents, and evaluates what execution establishes.
Connect supported application context, security observations, and engineering workflows. Discuss the connectivity, execution model, and data requirements your organization needs.
OKTA
GITHUB
GITLAB
JIRA
AWS
JENKINS
DOCKER
KUBERNETES
BITBUCKET
ARGOCDBring validation to where engineering work already happens. Define what to prove early, validate before release, and confirm every fix with evidence.
CTEM runs in five stages. Hayrok anchors the stages most programs struggle to operationalize, validation and mobilization, and feeds proven results back into the next cycle.
A CLI, a scope contract, and a scenario. That is all.
Enter your own volumes and costs. The estimate compares manual validation effort with evidence-backed validation, so your team spends time on fixes, not on proving findings.
It is continuous testing that proves which exposures an attacker can actually use to reach data, money, or operations. Real attack techniques run only within the scope, identities, and limits your team approves, and every result keeps replayable evidence.
Explore Nectar in Hive, follow a governed validation, and inspect the evidence behind the result. Discuss the coverage and execution requirements that fit your applications, APIs, and identities.
